BEHAVIORAL ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS IN ONLINE EDUCATION: AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT INTERACTION PATTERNS

Authors

  • Michael Anderson
  • Olivia Brown
  • Ethan Williams
  • Isabella Garcia

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between behavioral engagement and academic success in online learningenvironments by analyzingstudent interaction patterns derived from a structured dataset. The quantitative research designwas adopted with the use of a secondary dataset, retrieved on Kaggle (xAPI-Edu Data), which contains 480 records ofstudents. Participation, resource use, announcement interaction, and discussion activity were some of the indicators thatwere used to measure behavioral engagement. Python was used to analyze the data with descriptive statistics, reliabilityanalysis, Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. The findings show that there is a positive andstrong relationship between academic performance and behavioral engagement. The most important predictors ofacademic success identified were resource utilization and active involvement,with limited contribution of passiveengagement. A major discrepancyinengagement was noted among performance groups. The results emphasize the valueof creating interactive and student-focused online learning platforms that facilitate active learning. The research adds tothe existing body of literature by employing real-world LMS data and Python-based analysis to present a data-driveninsight into the dynamics of engagement in online education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student

engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of

Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher

education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*.

Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning

Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale

(OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079585

Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology

Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the

Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends,

(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated

learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78–82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009

Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions

as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement. Journal of College

Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A

proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement

Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222.

MOORE, M. G. (2013). The Theory of Transactional Distance. In Handbook of Distance Education (3rd ed.).

Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203803738-10/theory-transactional-distancemichael-grahame-moore

Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors Influencing Adult Learners’ Decision to Drop Out or Persist in Online

Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.

https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.207

Raj B., N. (2025). xAPI-Edu-Data. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/naveenrajb3/xapi-edu-data

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and

learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. d. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication

and collaboration. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’12,

–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661

Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical

investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1–15.

Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in MOOCs: Exploring the relationships among

motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2073–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09747-8

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_

Downloads

Published

2024-09-29

How to Cite

Anderson, M., Brown, O., Williams, E., & Garcia, I. (2024). BEHAVIORAL ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS IN ONLINE EDUCATION: AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT INTERACTION PATTERNS. International Journal For Research In Educational Studies, 10(3), 01–09. Retrieved from https://ijfres.com/index.php/es/article/view/2525