Seamless Learning Through Project ARDI in Research Based Instruction for Senior High School Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65327/es.v12i2.2540Keywords:
Seamless Learning Approach, Project ARDI, Research Competence, Academic Performance, Learner EngagementAbstract
This study examined the effectiveness of Seamless Learning Approach through Project ARDI in enhancing the research competence and academic performance of senior high school learners in research-based instruction. Mixed methodology was used to assess the engagement, benefits, academic productivity, research attitude, and performance outcome of learners prior to and post implementation of the research intervention. Validated survey questionnaires, pretest and posttest results, and academic records were the sources of quantitative data, while learners' reflection and feedback for qualitative data. In analyzing the results of the research, descriptive statistics, paired sample t-test, correlation analysis, and thematic analysis were used. The findings indicated that learners exhibited relatively competent research skills, minimal research mastery, and adequate academic performance. However, with the implementation of Project ARDI, considerable improvement was seen in all aspects. Learners developed highly competent engagement, perception of benefits, and attitude towards research, as well as increased academic productivity. Moreover, a significant difference was found between the posttest and pretest scores with improved academic performance in the second quarter indicating that Project ARDI helped learners enhance their academic performance. Additionally, qualitative data revealed trends toward empowerment, enhanced confidence, improved cooperation, integration of formal and informal learning, and greater recognition of the importance of research. Overall, these findings indicated that Project ARDI successfully transitioned participants from initial research participation to mid-advanced level of research engagement, revealing the effectiveness of integrated learning, technology-enhanced learning, and project-based learning approaches in fostering productive learning, competency development, and positive academic outcomes among senior high school research subjects.
Downloads
References
Abdulganiyu, K. (2025). Evaluating AI Adoption and Learning Outcomes in Under-Resourced Secondary Schools: A Case Study of Zaria Metropolis, Kaduna State. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17719335
Alj, Z., & Bouayad, A. (2024). Multidimensional determinants of academic performance: Insights from undergraduate students in Moroccan universities. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2404
Antonio, R.P. & Prudente M.S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educationin Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 12(1), 251-281.https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
Ardizone, M. T. (2024). Chromatic Learning: Enhancing Academic Engagement and Motivation in Research Subjects through Light Color Theory Techniques. International Journal of Research Publication. Vol. 156, p.7-29. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001561920247122
Ardizone, M.T., (2023). Problem-Based Learning: A Learner-Centered Approach to Upsurge Academic Triumph in Social Science Classroom. International Journal of Research Publications. 11-20. IJRP 2023, 123(1), 11-20; doi:.10.47119/IJRP1001231420234680
Arrieta‑Cohen, M. C., Torres‑Arizal, L. A., & Gómez‑Yepes, R. L. (2024). Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention using project‑based learning on postpandemic recovery in rural Colombia. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121341
Ayanwale, M.A., Adelana, O.P. & Odufuwa, T.T. Exploring STEAM teachers’ trust in AI-based educational technologies: a structural equation modelling approach. Discov Educ 3, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00092-z
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., and Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Cheng, M.-T., Lin, C.-C., Chen, Y.-H., Hsu, M.-E., & Cheng, F.-C. (2023). Anter: Ant Research Institute – Three iterations of testing to develop an ant world in the palm of the hand. Computers & Education, 198, 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104772
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Engida, M. A. (2024). The impact of teaching quality on student achievement. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1367317
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.) pp.117-124. SAGE Publications.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Fucio, R.L., Ardizone, M.T., Domingo, O.J., & Maningas, Z.N. (2023). The constructs of seamless blended digital learning program from the lenses of faculty and learners at Laguna University: Towards a sustainable program. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 7, 1647-1663. https://doi.org/ 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.125OECD. (2019).
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485480
Howard, S. K., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2022). Student engagement in blended learning environments: A systematic review of self-efficacy and learning transfer. Computers & Education, 188, 104565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104565
Hung, L. T., Thuy, D. T. T., & Thien, T. V. (2025). Factors affecting high school students’ academic performance: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.32912
Jatileni, C.N., Sanusi, I.T., Olaleye, S.A. et al. Artificial intelligence in compulsory level of education: perspectives from Namibian in-service teachers. Educ Inf Technol 29, 12569–12596 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12341-z
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Malicoban, L. (2025). Assessing the impact of real-time simulations on the pretest and posttest performance of Grade 8 learners. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000180
Nja, C.O., Idiege, K.J., Uwe, U.E. et al. Adoption of artificial intelligence in science teaching: From the vantage point of the African science teachers. Smart Learn. Environ. 10, 42 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00261-x
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
OECD Learning Compass 2030. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Okunade A.I. (2024) The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching of Science Education in Secondary Schools in Nigeria, European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 12 (1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejcsit2013/vol12n15767
Sambo-Magaji, A., Adewale, M. D., Ketebu, K. E., Jokthan, G. E., Bello, M., Azeta, A. A., Sheikh, F. A., & Ubadike, O. C. (2025). Systematic literature review: Challenges, implications, and frameworks for artificial intelligence adoption in Nigerian education. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research, 7(2, Special Issue), 2858–2868. https://doi.org/10.37933/nipes/7.4.2025.SI341
Sanusi, I. T., Agbo, F. J., Dada, O. A., Yunusa, A. A., Aruleba, K. D., Obaido, G., Olawumi, O., & Oyelere, S. S. (2024). Stakeholders’ insights on artificial intelligence education: Perspectives of teachers, students, and policymakers. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100212
Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., & Omidiora, J. O. (2022). Exploring teachers' preconceptions of teaching machine learning in high school: A preliminary insight from Africa. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100072
Sarker, S. (2024). Analyzing students’ academic performance using multiple performance categories: A research overview. Studies in Educational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100263
Sidi Daniel, Chadirwe, Enoch Gontul (2026). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Transforming Research Methods in Science Education in Nigeria, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100135.
Schindler, L.A., Burkholder, G.J., Morad, O.A., and Marsh, C. (2017) Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14, 25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Shek, D., & Zhu, X. (2018). Pretest–posttest designs. In The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vol. 4, pp. 1293-1295). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n538
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921-1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221
Tiyuri, A., Saberi, B., Miri, M., Shahrestanaki, E., Bayat, B.B., Salehiniya, H. (2016.) Research self-efficacy and its relationship with academic performance in postgraduate students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 7(1):p 11, | DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_43_17
Venzon, W. C., & Venzon, M. E. (2025). Advancing senior high school research skills through the integration of artificial intelligence tools. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 13(5). https://www.ijraset.com
Wahab, A.; Ghartey, I.; Asabere, T.; Adu-Poku, J.; & Brakwah, I. (2025). The Role of AI Tools in Shaping Teaching Practices for Design and Communication Skills: A Study in Ghana. J. Lat. Am. Sci. Cult. 7(11), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.52428/27888991.v7i11.1470
Wong, L, Milrad, M., Sharples, M., Hwang, G., Looi, C. (2013). Seamless Learning: An International Perspective on Next Generation Technology Enhanced Learning.
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728
Zimmerman, H. T. (2012). Participating in science at home: Recognition work and learning in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 597–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal For Research In Educational Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
